Agent StoreFinanceInternal Controls & SOX Compliance
Live

SOX Controls Testing Agent

FinanceInternal Controls & SOX Compliance

Executes walkthroughs, samples transactions, and documents evidence for internal control testing to support SOX 404 compliance.

4
Process steps
6
Integrations
3
Data inputs

SOX compliance requires testing dozens to hundreds of key controls across financial processes each year, pulling statistically valid samples, gathering evidence for each sample, and documenting whether the control operated effectively, all within a compressed testing calendar that competes with quarter-end close for the same finance staff

Manual testing is time-consuming and inconsistent between testers, and evidence gathering often means chasing down screenshots, approval emails, and system reports from process owners who are slow to respond

Deficiencies identified late in the testing cycle leave little time for remediation before the certification deadline, increasing the risk of a material weakness disclosure

Coordinating control testing across a growing number of systems and business units, while maintaining a clean, consistent workpaper trail for external auditors, is a persistent operational burden

The agent maintains the control matrix and testing calendar, pulls statistically appropriate samples for each control based on population data from source systems, and gathers supporting evidence directly from ERP, workflow, and approval systems where system access allows. It executes test procedures against defined attributes for each control, documents pass/fail results with the underlying evidence attached, and drafts deficiency writeups with root cause analysis for any control that fails testing. Testing status and remediation tracking are maintained continuously so gaps are visible well before the certification deadline.

1

Maintain Control Matrix and Plan Testing

  • Update the control matrix for process and system changes
  • Build the annual testing calendar aligned to the close cycle
  • Determine sample sizes using risk-based sampling methodology
Outcome: A current, risk-calibrated testing plan is in place before the testing cycle begins.
2

Pull Samples and Gather Evidence

  • Pull statistical samples from source system populations
  • Retrieve supporting evidence (approvals, system logs, reconciliations)
  • Organize evidence into standardized testing workpapers
Outcome: Evidence gathering is systematized rather than chased manually from process owners.
3

Execute Test Procedures

  • Test each sample against defined control attributes
  • Document pass/fail conclusions with supporting rationale
  • Identify exceptions requiring extended testing or investigation
Outcome: Control operating effectiveness is documented consistently across testers and cycles.
4

Document Deficiencies and Track Remediation

  • Draft deficiency writeups with root cause analysis for failures
  • Assess deficiency severity (deficiency, significant deficiency, material weakness)
  • Track remediation plans and retest status through resolution
Outcome: Deficiencies are identified with enough runway to remediate before certification.
AuditBoard
Workiva
SAP GRC
ServiceNow
NetSuite
Oracle Fusion