Agent StoreOperationsStructural Engineering Calculation QA
Live

Mechanical Load Calculation Review Agent

OperationsStructural Engineering Calculation QA

Independently reviews HVAC and mechanical engineering load calculations against building envelope data and code requirements to catch sizing errors before equipment procurement.

4
Process steps
6
Integrations
3
Data inputs

Mechanical engineers manually calculate heating and cooling loads using building envelope, occupancy, and equipment data, and a data entry error or missed load component such as internal gains or infiltration can lead to significantly oversized or undersized HVAC equipment, driving wasted capital cost or comfort complaints after occupancy

Second-checking these calculations is time-consuming and often skipped under deadline pressure

This agent independently recalculates heating and cooling loads using the same building parameters, compares results against the submitted calculation, and flags discrepancies before equipment is specified and ordered

The agent ingests building envelope data, occupancy schedules, internal load assumptions, and climate design data referenced in the mechanical engineer's load calculation, then independently computes heating and cooling loads using standard ASHRAE methodology. It compares its results against the submitted calculation output room by room and system by system, flagging discrepancies beyond acceptable tolerance and identifying likely root causes such as missing infiltration values or incorrect glazing U-factors. Findings are compiled into a QA report for the mechanical engineer's review before equipment sizing is finalized.

1

Parse Load Calculation Inputs

  • Extract building envelope and glazing parameters
  • Pull occupancy and internal load assumptions
  • Confirm climate design data and code basis
Outcome: All inputs needed for independent recalculation are captured.
2

Independently Recalculate Loads

  • Compute room-by-room heating and cooling loads
  • Apply standard ASHRAE methodology
  • Aggregate to system and equipment level totals
Outcome: An independent load result set exists for comparison.
3

Compare and Flag Discrepancies

  • Compare against submitted calculation within tolerance
  • Identify likely root cause of significant variances
  • Rank discrepancies by equipment sizing risk
Outcome: Sizing errors are caught before equipment specification.
4

Compile QA Report

  • Document findings with room and system detail
  • Attach recalculation trace for transparency
  • Route to mechanical engineer for resolution
Outcome: Verified load calculations support accurate equipment procurement.
Trane TRACE 3D Plus
Carrier HAP
Revit MEP
Bluebeam Revu
Excel
Newforma