Agent StoreOperationsCivil Engineering Site Survey Data Processing
Live

Geotechnical Report Data Extraction Agent

OperationsCivil Engineering Site Survey Data Processing

Extracts and structures key geotechnical parameters from soil boring reports, feeding structural and civil engineering foundation design with accurate, organized site data.

4
Process steps
6
Integrations
3
Data inputs

Structural and civil engineers receive geotechnical reports as dense narrative PDFs containing boring logs, soil classifications, and bearing capacity recommendations, and manually re-reading and transcribing these values into design calculations is slow and introduces the risk of misreading a critical value like allowable bearing pressure or groundwater depth

Design delays occur when engineers wait on manual data entry before foundation calculations can begin

This agent parses geotechnical reports, extracts key parameters such as soil classifications, bearing capacities, and groundwater levels by boring location, and structures the data for direct use in structural and civil design calculations

The agent ingests the geotechnical report PDF, using text and table extraction to identify boring log data, soil classification per unified soil classification system, allowable bearing pressures, groundwater depth, and any special foundation recommendations. It cross-references boring locations against the site plan to map spatial variation in soil conditions, structures the extracted data into a format compatible with structural design software, and flags any unusual or high-risk geotechnical findings such as expansive soils or high water table for engineer attention.

1

Parse Geotechnical Report

  • Extract boring log data and soil classifications
  • Identify bearing capacity and groundwater depth values
  • Capture special foundation recommendations
Outcome: All key geotechnical parameters are extracted from the narrative report.
2

Map Spatial Data

  • Cross-reference boring locations to site plan coordinates
  • Identify spatial variation in soil conditions across the site
  • Flag areas with differing foundation requirements
Outcome: Geotechnical conditions are mapped spatially across the project site.
3

Structure Design-Ready Data

  • Format extracted parameters for structural design software
  • Organize by boring location and depth interval
  • Validate data completeness against report scope
Outcome: Engineers receive structured, design-ready geotechnical data.
4

Flag Risk Conditions

  • Identify expansive soils, high water table, or fill conditions
  • Highlight recommendations requiring special foundation design
  • Route flagged items to structural engineer
Outcome: High-risk geotechnical conditions get early engineering attention.
Bluebeam Revu
gINT
AutoCAD Civil 3D
Adobe Acrobat
SharePoint
STAAD Foundation