Agent StoreFinanceFinancial Reporting & Technical Accounting
Live

Asset Impairment Testing Agent

FinanceFinancial Reporting & Technical Accounting

Runs periodic goodwill, long-lived asset, and investment impairment tests and documents the analysis to support financial statement conclusions.

4
Process steps
6
Integrations
3
Data inputs

Impairment testing under ASC 350 and ASC 360 requires identifying triggering events, defining reporting units and asset groups correctly, building discounted cash flow or market-based fair value models, and documenting judgment in a way that survives auditor and SEC scrutiny

Finance teams often treat impairment analysis as an annual fire drill built from scratch each cycle, with fair value models maintained by whoever built them last and key assumptions like discount rates and terminal growth poorly documented

Missing a triggering event between annual tests, such as a sustained stock price decline or loss of a major customer, is a common source of restatement risk

Coordinating inputs across FP&A, treasury, and business unit leaders under a tight reporting timeline adds further pressure to an already judgment-heavy process

The agent monitors qualitative and quantitative indicators, such as market capitalization relative to book value, business unit performance versus forecast, and macroeconomic factors, to flag potential triggering events between scheduled test dates. It maintains fair value models for each reporting unit or asset group, pulling current financial data, discount rate inputs, and comparable company multiples to run quantitative impairment tests, and generates the supporting memo documenting assumptions, sensitivities, and conclusions. Prior period assumptions are tracked so period-over-period changes in key inputs are visible and explainable to auditors.

1

Monitor Triggering Events

  • Track market cap vs. book value and business unit performance vs. forecast
  • Screen macroeconomic and industry indicators
  • Flag potential interim triggering events for review
Outcome: Triggering events are caught as they occur rather than discovered at year-end.
2

Build and Update Fair Value Models

  • Refresh discounted cash flow and market multiple models per reporting unit
  • Update discount rate and terminal growth assumptions
  • Pull current financial actuals and forecasts into each model
Outcome: Fair value models stay current and ready to run rather than rebuilt from scratch each cycle.
3

Run Impairment Analysis

  • Execute quantitative tests comparing fair value to carrying value
  • Run sensitivity analysis on key assumptions
  • Identify reporting units or asset groups at risk of impairment
Outcome: A clear, quantified impairment conclusion is produced for each unit tested.
4

Document and Report Findings

  • Draft the supporting impairment memo with assumptions and sensitivities
  • Compare assumptions to prior period for consistency
  • Package documentation for auditor and disclosure committee review
Outcome: Audit-ready documentation is produced with full assumption traceability.
Oracle Hyperion
Workiva
Capital IQ
PitchBook
Anaplan
Microsoft Excel / Power BI