Agent StoreLegalDispute Resolution
Live

Arbitration Case Management Agent

LegalDispute Resolution

Tracks arbitration filing deadlines, organizes exhibit and pleading submissions, and monitors procedural compliance across multiple concurrent arbitration proceedings.

4
Process steps
5
Integrations
3
Data inputs

Managing arbitration proceedings requires tracking each tribunal's distinct procedural timetable, including submission deadlines, hearing dates, and document exchange obligations, which vary by arbitral institution and governing rules and are typically tracked manually by whoever is staffed on the matter

When legal teams run several concurrent arbitrations, deadlines and procedural nuances between proceedings are easy to conflate, risking missed submissions or procedural non-compliance that can prejudice the case

This agent ingests each arbitration's procedural order and institutional rules to build a matter-specific compliance calendar, organizes exhibit and pleading submissions against tribunal formatting requirements, and monitors document exchange deadlines across all active proceedings from a single dashboard

The agent triggers when a new arbitration matter is opened, ingesting the procedural order, arbitration agreement, and applicable institutional rules such as ICC, AAA, or LCIA rules to extract the matter's specific deadline schedule. It uses an LLM to parse procedural order language for submission deadlines, page limits, and formatting requirements, builds a matter-specific compliance calendar, and cross-references it against the firm's broader arbitration docket to surface potential scheduling conflicts across concurrent proceedings. The agent organizes incoming and outgoing exhibits and pleadings against tribunal formatting rules, flags submissions that fail formatting or page limit requirements before filing, and sends tiered deadline reminders to the case team throughout the proceeding.

1

Ingest Procedural Framework

  • Parse the procedural order for matter-specific deadlines
  • Identify applicable institutional rules governing the arbitration
  • Extract page limits, formatting, and submission requirements
  • Build the matter-specific compliance calendar
Outcome: A complete procedural compliance calendar is established for the arbitration.
2

Monitor Cross-Matter Scheduling

  • Cross-reference deadlines against the firm's broader arbitration docket
  • Identify scheduling conflicts across concurrent proceedings
  • Flag resource conflicts for case team staffing
  • Alert case managers to overlapping hearing or submission dates
Outcome: Scheduling conflicts across multiple concurrent arbitrations are surfaced early.
3

Organize Submissions

  • Track exhibit and pleading submissions against tribunal requirements
  • Check draft submissions against page limit and formatting rules
  • Flag non-compliant submissions before filing deadline
  • Maintain an organized exhibit index for the proceeding
Outcome: Submissions comply with tribunal formatting requirements before they are filed.
4

Track Compliance and Report

  • Send tiered reminders ahead of each procedural deadline
  • Log submission and exchange completion against the calendar
  • Generate case status reports for the case team and client
  • Archive the full procedural compliance record for the matter
Outcome: The case team maintains full procedural compliance with a documented record throughout the arbitration.
iManage
stores and organizes exhibit and pleading submissions
Opus 2
manages hearing bundle and exhibit indexing for the proceeding
Microsoft Outlook
delivers tiered procedural deadline reminders
CaseMap
tracks case facts and cross-references witness statement content
Microsoft Word
checks draft submissions against page limit and formatting rules